I applied online. The process took 2 months. I interviewed at Amazon (Seattle, WA) in Jan 2015
Interview
It started by applying through LinkedIn, passed two telephone interviews and was invited for on-site interview. The overall process was very organized and efficient as it was holiday season and travel was required for on-site interview. Those who interviewed were very nice and knowledgable. They were professionally trained and did not waste time.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Standard good questions and amazon value was to be considered in every answer.
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Amazon (Irvine, CA) in Aug 2015
Interview
I had a brief phone screen with a recruiter, who passed me off to a different/internal recruiter who scheduled me for another phone interview with the hiring manager. The hiring manager had the same title as he was hiring for. That seemed a bit strange, but he assured me that titles aren't very important at Amazon. That has all sorts of negative connotations for me, so it was not a good start. His questions were focused on my past employment and trying to obtain extreme details about *how* I did my jobs in the past. He was patient in answering my questions.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
My interviewer pressed me for details about *how* I did my past jobs.
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Amazon (Seattle, WA) in Aug 2015
Interview
Recently interviewed for the Sr. TPM role at Seattle, WA. The overall process took 2 weeks starting with Phone interviews. 2 Phone screens went well, invited for an Onsite with in a week. The Recruiter was very prompt until onsite interview.
The interview panel had 7 people each having a round of 45 min and 1 hr lunch interview with the Hiring manger. Here are the bullets from the interview:-
1. For Sr. TPM role, 2 interviewers were TPM i.e. Jr. to the role I was being interviewed. Not enough Sr. Architect people who could evaluate real solutions I suggested.
2. Being Technical Architect, I did very well for the design questions asked. However, not sure what the interviewers were expecting since I did not hear much cross questions on the designs. Everyone agreed to what I suggested.
3. Most annoying part, EVERYONE was just "quoting" on their laptops every word out of my mouth. It is so ridiculous to have the person in front not giving any reaction to the answers except for typing and typing and typing... Didn't feel anyone tried to understand the logic or approach, just the words. In short, if they typed it right you have a chance to get the job and may be this is the the reason 2 out of 10 (read somewhere in the reviews) onsite get an offer.
4. Most of the questions were around "deadlines, delays". I told them if business and IT are in sync with expectations i.e. priorities are synced at the Leadership/Org level then you would not have such a situation where everyone is trying to push their Request in. The answer can not be, "I as a program manager will push the envelope for the teams to deliver whatever I am requesting, either hiring more resources or asking for longer hours at work". To me, this could be one time solution(exceptional cases) not a sustainable model since problem lies at upper level vs. fixing at PM or team level. So, not sure how interviewers read it, given none from Management/Business was present.
5. I was promised to hear back from them Monday of following week, no response until Wednesday when I sent an email stating I am passing this position.
6. No attempt to sell this position.
7. What I liked, people were nice ignoring their typing skills :)
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Most of the questions were behavioral and leadership principles along with some design and algorithm.