employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Booz Allen Hamilton

Engaged Employer

Booz Allen Hamilton reviews

3.9

74% would recommend to a friend

(10,426 total reviews)
avatar

Horacio D. Rozanski

79% approve of CEO

55% positive business outlook

Booz Allen Hamilton has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 10,426 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Booz Allen Hamilton employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Tecnologia da informação industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

10K reviews
3.0
Aug 24, 2011
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Some of the smartest people in the world to work with and some of the greatest and most challenging client assignments one could hope for.

Cons

Gone almost entirely to staff augmentation. The Booz of 10+ years ago (i.e. strategy consulting) is long gone. Almost impossible to get a promotion once you reach the upper ranks; at that point, its every person for themselves. Ralph Schrader sold the company down the tubes and everyone else drank the kool-aid!

3.0
Jun 6, 2011
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

-Good opportunity to learn from colleagues -Offers a good picture of government from the outside -Benefits are pretty good -Firm seems to continue to have a strong reputation among clients and subsequent employers

Cons

- Since going public, leadership has a short term focus - no longer makes investments - Top leadership is out to get the stock price up and then escape, compounding the short term focus to please wall street and shareholders - Much less functional expertise than ten years ago - because everyone is expected to focus on a single client "domain" and be everything for that client - The firm's leverage model went from 50:1 empoyees per equity-owning partner in 1998 to 200:1 or more now - so leadership is completely divorced from client work and daily reality (more time for politics), and employees have little chance to ever make the "partner" equivalent (they gave themselves a title upgrade at the same time they introduced two new rungs on the career ladder, so now partners are "Senior VPs" instead of just "VPs"

4.0
Jan 21, 2011
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Employer name recognition and reputation - Booz is widely considered the best federal consulting firm, and it is pretty much true. This can be helpful when/if you decide to move on. Excellence - there is a constant striving for excellence and improvement in order to maintain our reputation and add the value (for the prices we charge). This will help you develop if you are around the right people, yet it can also be a con (see below). People - most of the people are good, nice, professional and helpful. There is a definite difference in the Booz culture of teamwork and collaboration. Benefits and investment in people - the firm's investment in people isn't lip-service (although some feel they could do better). Training/staff development money is available and its use is encouraged. Your job is not tied to your task - people change tasks all the time within Booz. And if you aren't on a task for a while you won't be fired unless they really don't want you around. I know someone who didn't bill client work for 3 months, this person's management found internal work or allowed billing to the administrative charge number for periods of time. Corporate services and collaboration - the firm does a good job at offering tools to help employees stay connected to the firm and manage various aspects of the job. I'm specifically thinking of the copious intranet resources such as the enterprise 2.0 service "Hello", the various Forums, and various people services tools. It is valuable being able to reach back to large groups of people in the firm for input and answers to questions. Corporate organization and strategy - The firm may reorganize and make a major change every 2 years (like the recent work-where-you-live strategy), but this can be considered a demonstration of flexibility and forward-thinking strategy. At least they are working on constantly adapting and improving. In my time at the firm I have noticed that the people tend to be much more competent individually and as a whole, and the quality of our work is almost always superior to other contractors and the client (that's why they pay us). Anyone who works in government contracting/consulting may do well to spend a few years at Booz.

Cons

Utilization - being billable and profitable is managements top priority. It is the only thing that will make them drop what they are doing and actually call you. Management seems to be focused primarily on business development and utilization. Employer name recognition and reputation - the downside of being an expensive FTE from a well known firm with high standards is that there is little-to-no leeway for mistakes. Requirements for excellence - there isn't much room for error, the slightest hint from the client that you might be doing something less than perfect may result in a meeting with a manager and justification for not promoting you. Advancement - Requirements for promotions are never clear and are a moving target. Everyone in the firm knows only a select few who sell business have a chance at becoming Senior Associates on the path to Partner, the rest stay at Associate-level or move on to other companies. Additionally, different teams/managers apply the promotion criteria differently. I've met a few Sr. consultants that were working at or below the consultant-level and vice versa but the consultants weren't getting promoted. Also promotions are probably given in the first year only if they underpaid you when you were hired. Success = perception of success - If your manager thinks you aren't good enough for a promotion, regardless of how well you match the career development model, you won't get a promotion (endorsement from managers and your seniors is essential); conversely if everyone thinks you are a stellar consultant it may as well be true even if it isn't. Individual experience may vary - the team you are a part of, and the management you fall under make up half of your experience. A good team and manager will help and support you, and provide guidance to help you improve or succeed, bad managers won't support your tasking and career work. Also the task you are placed on makes up the other half of your experience, if you are on a dead-end task your career growth will stall. Changing tasks is dependent on your career manager, so that varies as well. Being a government contractor - The top priority is to remain billable, that is the nature of the business. And at the end of the day, we are stuck with whatever work the client tasks us with and whatever decisions the client makes, regardless of what we think or recommend. Work-life balance - many of those who are on certain tasks can end up working crazy hours (fortunately I'm not one of them), but that is the nature of the business. Be careful of what task you end up on. You will do more than a contractor - As you go up in level you will be required to perform more and more activities outside your task/client-work (business development, marketing, internal team tasks, assessments, interviews, etc). Networking is "encouraged", and failing to do some extracurricular activities can inhibit your career advancement or be treated as a development action on your assessment. Income - everyone will tell you that your income is less than at other firms, especially when you are first hired. But there are many tangible (e.g. ECAP, training) and intangible benefits to working at Booz.

Viewing 70 - 72 of 10,426 Reviews

Glassdoor has 11,058 Booz Allen Hamilton reviews submitted anonymously by Booz Allen Hamilton employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Booz Allen Hamilton is right for you.