Pros
It's a good company, primarily due to its people. Most individuals are kind, although there are a few who exhibit toxic or impolite behavior. The company provides ample opportunities to learn and explore new skills. However, sometimes, trends like architecture styles and design patterns are followed without genuine necessity. Additionally, there is an excessive emphasis on Microservices, leading to unnecessary challenges and costs that could be mitigated through monolithic alternatives. Diversifying by creating services in languages such as Go or Python, instead of solely focusing on .NET, could be beneficial.
Cons
The CEO unilaterally decided to end remote work, ignoring its proven effectiveness and the positive impact it had on employees' work-life balance, especially in tech roles like software engineering. Surprisingly, there was no effort to gather input through a survey or consider employees' opinions; instead, a dictatorial approach was taken, leading to demotivated engineers seeking new job opportunities. The decision to revert to office work, starting with 2 days a week and escalating to 3, appears more focused on cost-cutting than on employees' well-being. This rigid stance, devoid of negotiation or alternatives, has led to a mass exodus of talented individuals. The company's financial struggles are evident, as seen in their request to borrow $200 million from the SEC, yet these challenges are being tackled at the expense of the company's core values and its dedicated workforce. It's disheartening to witness the company lose valuable employees due to this misguided approach.
