Competitive, high responsibility roles - Anonymous employee Halliburton Employee Review

4.0
Sep 21, 2011
Anonymous employee
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Halliburton has deep roots in its employees. There were numerous employees that I worked with that had worked there over 30 or 40 years. This is because Halliburton takes care of its people, tries to ensure that employees are proud of and satisfied with their work, and pushes employees to achieve new heights.

Cons

Many, if not all, of the people that I interacted with at Halliburton were over worked and stated that they wished they had more time to spend with their families. Most of these people were happy with their career and enjoyed working with Halliburton but wished they were not so overloaded at work that they couldn't get home in time to spend the evening with their families.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
May 28, 2026
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Culture is great. Lots of opportunity to grow.

Cons

Company doesn't have work from home option.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All