"Is it everything you thought?" - Operator Assistant II Halliburton Employee Review

3.0
Mar 31, 2018
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

The benefits are outstanding. Great and affordable health insurance, discounted stock purchase, 401k matching, dental and vision. Discounts available for Halliburton employees for everything from vehicle purchase to lasik surgery. This is a good place to get started if you do not have any oilfield experience. But if you do, it will just infuriate you.

Cons

Basic per hour pay is the lowest I have ever had in the oilfield as a CDL Hazmat driver. You are dependent upon overtime to make a decent wage, working 100+ hours a week. When limited to 40 hours a week when work is slow, it is hard to want to come to work. Because of massive layoffs last year, the supervisors that are left are a mixed bag to work with. In general, they do not care about you as an individual employee, only how your physical labor can help them get promoted or get their next bonus. Promotion is easy to obtain with the competency system, but it takes work on your part. No one is going to teach you what you want to know, you have to go after it. You might get a whole $1 an hour raise, putting you still under the oilfield average. The orientation training I went through was sub-par and did little to prepare the new hires for what was really expected of a frac/acid operator.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Teaches the fundamentals of the oil and gas industry.

Cons

Sometimes knowing the direction of the project is difficult.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All