Good place to work if you seeking steady growth - Supply Chain Management Graduate Halliburton Employee Review

4.0
Mar 27, 2019
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

- Hire and Fire mentality ensures the best team composition - Robust hiring practices that ensure only good talent comes in - A structured program which allows for proper development - Relative competitive compensation package - Healthy work-life balance (everyone comes in and goes home together due to locations of facilities) - Free transport (only applicable to Singapore) - Alright medical benefits - Typical American culture where if you can perform and give results, you can rise very quickly - Supply Chain Management Program definitely gives a good head-start to fresh graduates

Cons

- If you joining the Supply Chain Management Program - be prepared to develop your career mainly in Manufacturing and be prepared for a stressful 2.5 years (rewarding if you manage to graduate) - If you joining the Technology Department - be prepared for very slow career advancement (but excellent work-life balance if you ask me) - Location of the facilities means if you miss the shuttle bus, you will most probably take MC on that day (extremely hard to get to work via public transport and super expensive by taxi) - Get used to canteen food (for the facility located at Tuas) - cheap but taste wise meh

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Teaches the fundamentals of the oil and gas industry.

Cons

Sometimes knowing the direction of the project is difficult.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All