Biggest mistakes were to stay this long with Sperry Drilling Halliburton MWD - MWD Field Engineer Halliburton Employee Review

1.0
Oct 31, 2019
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Just get the 3months-1yr experience and start looking for something else. Medical was a catch but getting expensive now

Cons

Stay away from the Interwood Houston district. Management is going to be against you if you call them out on any safety issues. Instead of concentrating on the job, they make you drive to another rig to pick tools/equipment to use for the job, instead of using a hotshot truck. Don't work here, they never seem to keep employees due to poor Coordinators/Management They reject overtime but still wants you to work overtime You get a lot of sleepless than and expect to carry out the job. Coordinators lack communications You don't get parts for the jobs on time They cut bonus and paychecks every 6months They hire a bunch of trainees and expect you to train them without incentives The moment you go against the coordinators, they will find some time to fire you. You work 24/7 but they only pay you 12 hrs for being gone and whatever months the jobs take. You are allowed to charge 13hrs per day being away on the job, anytime over 13hrs they reject it or question you why the overtime. Please, IMO stay away. This place is where you call the 'Toxic work environment'.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
May 28, 2026
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Culture is great. Lots of opportunity to grow.

Cons

Company doesn't have work from home option.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All