"Dream" job turned nightmare - Anonymous employee Halliburton Employee Review

1.0
Dec 27, 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

The money was somewhat decent (although seemingly not the most competitive) and the benefits were not shabby.

Cons

A sink-or-swim environment where you will wade through hidden politics, lies, distrust, and fear. Diversity is a buzz word. There are times when you'll hear quite a bit of negative remarks that are targeted towards minority groups (women, LGBT, individuals w/ disabilities, racial minorities, etc). Unless the policy has changed, only opposite-sex partners are eligible for company health benefits. Then again, I really shouldn't be that surprised... it's Halliburton, not Google. Not a very positive atmosphere overall. No one really seemed to care about the mission/vision (whatever that is). Most people come to work in the mornings, work during lunch, and try to cram as much as they can so that they can (hopefully) leave early. Work/life balance is virtually non-existent so be prepared to be stressed out. You won't find many employees volunteering their time to stay later because it's pretty much required.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All