Beware of misleading job titles! - Planner Halliburton Employee Review

2.0
Nov 7, 2022
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Great insurance benefit for the immediate family. Ideal working hours of 730-430pm.

Cons

Uses excel for planning and keeping data. No intention of upgrading system. The talk is always next year but nothing changes. No WFH and management don't intend to do so. Very low morale teammates, high turnover especially in production planning. Everyday firefighting. Each part number that you raise request to adjust planning, has to be recorded in excel and for their approval. On average, a planner has to handle about 1000PN. There's no demand planning, it is still supply planning but they termed it as demand so it sounds nicer. The role you applied for may not be the role you get until you get your contract. Reason they usually give because there’s rotation. But the rotation always happens because of attrition. Management does not know what they want. You could be doing different MRP group every month. There is an "internal team"- something like a cult. They will protect themselves and always have "special treatments".

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 12, 2026
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Teaches the fundamentals of the oil and gas industry.

Cons

Sometimes knowing the direction of the project is difficult.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All