Springer Nature reviews

4.0

84% would recommend to a friend

(1,530 total reviews)

Frank Vrancken Peeters

82% approve of CEO

72% positive business outlook

Springer Nature has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 1,530 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Springer Nature employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Mídia e comunicação industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
1.0
Apr 17, 2024

Quantity over quality

Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Colleagues were supportive and knowledgable

Cons

All employees were overworked and underpaid. Focus on maximising no. published articles a year over quality assurance

avatar
Springer Nature Response
2y
Thank you for sharing and sorry to hear about some of your experiences. Quality of our work is something we are very proud of and critical to maintain in the communities that we support. Around the world, Springer Nature aims to be a great company to work for and look at unlock the full potential of our colleagues. Our commitment extends to having an inclusive culture and offering opportunities to learn and grow. We regularly benchmark our salaries and look to ensure we offer a rewarding and enduring career with us. Our flexbility, hybrid working and Workation policy allow a good blend of work and relaxing home life and is proving popular with our colleagues.
3.0
May 10, 2023
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Colleagues are largely friendly and sociable, they care about what they do. Office is nice. There is a desire to fix some of the older systems, mess of data and tech legacy.

Cons

Talk of IPO was on the horizon but did not make the number desired back in 2020. Rumblings from above suggest same in next few years. Instant revenue is valued, presentee-ism in working from home policy and a covert move to transfer technical resource to Pune office aka SNTPS in new organisational discussions. Management issues, DEI here is a joke and several senior women with experience have been passed over for promotion or left altogether in website, IT, technology teams. Transparency is a huge issue, senior teams have big plans they will not share with teams this will impact. Getting a promotion largely hinges on halo effect of highly visible work not competency, hiring confirmation bias or popularity over the right candidate. Technical teams are short staffed with huge workloads they cannot deliver. Advice to Management Be transparent.

avatar
Springer Nature Response
3y
Thank you for your feedback. The IPO talk referred to here was a few years ago and we are now focusing on our growth strategy. We are proud of the work we do and have published our stats in the 2022 Sustainability report. So currently 43% in our top three tiers are female and our target is 45% by end of 2023. Last year we actually hired more women than men and diversity is top of our agenda. We are looking to diversify our location strategy also and will continue to hire across the globe in our core locations. We have a speak up culture and encourage all our colleagues to talk to their manager or their managers manager if things are not clear. Alternatively please contact HR. Thank you again.
2.0
Mar 6, 2023
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Full time employment and not contracted, which is rare for many who wish to leave academia. Other editors are friendly and it's nice to work in an international team. If you like to travel, there are plenty of opportunities for that.

Cons

High workload and little reprieve due to high editorial staff turnover. Salaries may be just average for publishing but below average for skills required for the job (a PhD). Your experience and wellbeing is entirely dependent on your relationship to your line manager, who may not always have your best professional interests at heart. Little to no room for growth after senior editor promotion. Company is very opaque on salaries with major discrepancies between offices and editors, and no room for negotiation. Difficult to work for some of the purely open access journals for moral reasons.

Viewing 106 - 108 of 1,530 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,718 Springer Nature reviews submitted anonymously by Springer Nature employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Springer Nature is right for you.