Argus Media reviews

3.9

76% would recommend to a friend

(474 total reviews)

Adrian Binks

65% approve of CEO

66% positive business outlook

Argus Media has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 474 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Argus Media employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Mídia e comunicação industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

474 reviews
3.0
Dec 20, 2018
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

I had a fabulous few years at Argus, and loved the majority of my time there. There are a lot of incredibly talented, smart, friendly, and interesting people (sadly though a lot of them seem to be leaving or have left) who I learned a lot from. In particular, the head of London marketing was a real gem. She has crucial industry knowledge and a real dedication to the products.

Cons

Unfortunately in some departments there isn’t a lot of career/role development. By all means, if you do well you’ll pick up more responsibility, but you’ll also keep all of your existing work, meaning a lot of people end up in quite bizarre hybrid roles, focused on important strategic projects as well as basic administrative/logistical work. Rather than spend even a small amount more on additional junior resource, the powers-that-be seem to prefer to squeeze existing teams as much as they possibly can. Obviously this isn’t efficient and those teams resort to just fire-fighting; they can just about meet deadlines and fulfill tactical activities, but they have little to no time to plan properly or take advantage of real opportunities that may present themselves – at least without letting anything else slide off. Adding another layer to that, there has been a lot of change in the business overall – with new senior management and a complete global restructure. Even acknowledging that it’s common for change to bring about discontent/unease in any workforce, there are a lot of things that could have been done a hundred times better and then some others that were downright bizarre. At a simplistic level it seems that they are trying to emulate the market incumbent, but they should be embracing the differentiators that have always made Argus what it is, instead of simply trying to copy. At a more concerning level, some outdated and scattergun approaches to marketing were starting to be introduced – at no point should “clickbait” be a tactic to pursue for example, which is something directly overheard from new senior management. This is in addition to setting arbitrary goals without any strategy behind them. For example, there is no point simply trying to double the size of a marketing prospect list without any (even basic) context such as market segment and job function, let alone commercial goals, projected revenue or even basic market sizing exercises being applied/investigated.

2.0
Jun 7, 2022
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

A group of very driven colleagues who are subject experts Better than average supporting functions

Cons

The leadership empowers extremely incompetent and vindictive individuals and does not have a realistic vision about Argus’ positioning against competitors. Certain team is running like a small family business where favoritism, dictatorship is tolerated and the team is losing talents in a record speed.

3.0
Jun 22, 2015

Market reporter

Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Argus is a great place to learn a lot about the energy industry, especially if you're interested in working for an oil and gas company. It's actually a great place to be a journalist, as long as you don't mind giving up a byline and are willing to do a fair amount of mundane, administrative tasks. The pay is better than most journalism jobs out there, as are the benefits. Your beat is really what you make of it. If you want to write several stories a day, chase down scoops, dig through filings, then you're encouraged to do so. You work with a lot of great journalists, many who have left Bloomberg, Reuters or the WSJ for a job that offers a better work life balance.

Cons

While writing opportunities are excellent, there are few pure writing jobs within the company. Most reporters are tasked with putting out a daily report, which basically requires a lot of drone work. You have to collect prices and deals and enter deals into a spreadsheet and design a report. This can lead to long hours and can get mind-numbing after a period of time. The company is organized in teams based on product. Not all teams are treated the same. Some teams are allowed to come in at 10 am, take long lunches and they get by without writing any stories at all. Other teams are held to a higher standard. This is driven largely by line managers, but upper management is certainly not oblivious to the questionable work ethic of some employees and lets it slide. The lack of uniform standards has a negative impact on morale. General culture could use a little improvement. The individual people are quite nice to work with, but most people only communicate on yahoo. Sometimes it makes going to work kind of a drag, especially if you value human interaction. Reporters do not get bonuses, and there are few opportunities for promotion. You're not really incentivized to work hard, especially when employees who work lesser hours and contribute less are allowed to do so and indicate no qualms about their compensation. Be sure to counter whatever initial offer is given, as mine turned out to be a total low-ball. Management seems okay with a high turnover rate. This is great if you're just looking to get some experience, but if you're looking to build a career, Argus might not be the best spot.

Viewing 19 - 21 of 474 Reviews

Glassdoor has 523 Argus Media reviews submitted anonymously by Argus Media employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Argus Media is right for you.