employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Booz Allen Hamilton

Engaged Employer

Booz Allen Hamilton reviews

3.9

74% would recommend to a friend

(10,425 total reviews)
avatar

Horacio D. Rozanski

79% approve of CEO

55% positive business outlook

Booz Allen Hamilton has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 10,425 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Booz Allen Hamilton employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Tecnologia da informação industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

10K reviews
1.0
Dec 21, 2014
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Having BAH on your resume isn't a career killer... yet. The company does have contracts and relationships with senior government so opportunities do exist to do interesting work.

Cons

BLUF: best to avoid at least for now. Post IPO the firm must work through the growing pains, and either mature, or fail. Salaries are falling. Many recent stories of pay cuts at both senior and mid-level employees. Benefits have been dramatically cut. The ECAP/401(k) has been dramatically reduced. The health insurance is both laughable and expensive. Training is handed out sparingly and only to those in favor. Hoteling-based work environment for the lucky few who aren't pushed to client site 100%. Leadership has no idea how to interact with on site employees, limiting career opportunity for those on site. The company doesn't invest in the formal systems needed for an org its size, so HR, IT, financial tools, staff networking, etc is frustrating at best. Career planning is nothing but a hope and a prayer. Finally, the firm has some tough decisions to make. It has been moving down the consulting chain away from strategy to more butts-in-seats work to chase top line revenues. These contracts are tighter margin hence the salary and benefits cuts. It's hiring, staffing, marketing, pricing, and staff training and retention programs must adapt to these realities. In the meantime, continue to expect mid level and highly talented employees to continue to leave as the mix of interesting work ends and cost pressures drive staffing to young and cheaper new hires.

2.0
Nov 17, 2014

Used to be Great Company

Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

I joined this company believing in the line "delivering results that endure." However, I quickly realized that what endures is the greed of the partners. The benefits used to be great until they decided to shift the burden on employees, and now you pay high health care premiums. For example, for a family coverage, you paid $281 monthly, but as of January 1, 2015- same coverage is $465. The opportunities to grow professionally are there, but at what cost?

Cons

The work-life balance is an oxymoron, because it is usual to work 60 hours and be required to officially record 40 hours per week. Remember, if you record 60 hours, the client's isn't paying for that and you will blow the budget out the water. Unfortunately, leadership used to be great but now isn't there. People are overworked and underpaid. I know people who've left the firm and gained 30% pay increase, some even doubled their salaries.

3.0
Oct 27, 2014
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

The firm has a lot of very smart people, and is very friendly to scientists and veterans. They have a large footprint across the federal government, so there are a good number of opportunities. The firm seems to do a better job of weathering events like the government shutdown than their peers (SAIC, BAE, etc...). There is a decent level of stability given the industry. There are high ethical standards, a focus on quality work, and opportunities to advance.

Cons

Since the Carlyle buyout and the IPO, there has been a series of cost cutting efforts that seem to focus on improving the P&L in time for each quarterly earnings announcement. Over the last few years, we've had: * a (poorly executed) move to hoteling that killed any sense of team cohesion. * reduction in the 401(k) (Actually, the previous program was a 10% profit share, now it is a 6% match that only pays out if you are still employed at the firm at the end of the year) * Reduction in health insurance (a switch to high-deductible plans) * Watering down the 360 degree assessment process to one that amounts to little more than a checklist. *(They even got rid of all plants in the offices as a way to save money) Every couple of years, management tries to dramatically shift the organization with the promise that This Time Is Different. There have been switches back and forth between functional and market aligned structures. There was the One Firm push to integrate the commercial and government businesses ("we are one firm, we can work together"), followed by the split of the two halves ("we were really two separate businesses, with different models and cultures"), and the attempt to recreate a commercial business ("This time will be different"). When I started, the firm's culture, reputation as a premium brand, and benefits were the big draws. I don't think any of them are particularly notable anymore. Over the last year there have been a bunch of efforts that are hard to look at with an unjaded eye -- the "Ed talks" are the firm's take on Ted talks (having a senior vice president give a speech while walking around on a stage really doesn't capture the whole Ted experience); knock-offs of Shark Tank, and superficial talk of innovation fill our email boxes along with videos of our new president's "Connect Tour." Some employees are paid to try and build excitement on Yammer. A lot of effort goes into what one might call "influence operations" to convince employees that management is on their side.

Viewing 43 - 45 of 10,425 Reviews

Glassdoor has 11,056 Booz Allen Hamilton reviews submitted anonymously by Booz Allen Hamilton employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Booz Allen Hamilton is right for you.