AkzoNobel reviews

3.7

68% would recommend to a friend

(1,871 total reviews)

Gregoire Poux-Guillaume

72% approve of CEO

51% positive business outlook

AkzoNobel has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 1,871 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The AkzoNobel employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufatura industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
2.0
Jun 27, 2023
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pension and life benefits, nice people managers on site,

Cons

Lots of discrepancies around pay grading system, it used to be good company to work for but over last couple of years employees getting less benefits and less pay rise. When promoted to management role the salary is shocking. Trying to give the least to employees even if your performance is outstanding and the site is doing exceptionally well. Limited resources for getting any qualifications that are recognizable outside of the business. Diversity, inclusion and equity are only to show off and promote Akzo and not implemented. Still a lot to do in the area .Big differences in pay depends of the gender and nationality, slim chances for women to get into management role and if successful is well underpaid. Some senior managers micromanaging and do not share them knowledge. Yearly bonus well affected due to financial performance but share holders yearly bonus not affected. That is just showing lack of integrity.

3.0
Feb 6, 2020
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Outstanding benefits. Overall friendly culture. Generally, people are extremely helpful.

Cons

Too many promises made to shareholders about cutbacks (15X20), leading to 45% of bonuses paid in 2019, and bonuses are expected to be even lower in 2020. Multiple sites have closed, leading to increased unemployment. Continued restructuring means that people are doing more with less resources, leading to more stress amongst site managers. Additionally, the restructuring makes it challenging to determine who does what. Long-time employees share that this is the lowest morale has ever been. If applying for a job, ask a lot of questions about long-term outlook of both the position and the location. I additionally recommend asking about site retention and turnover percentage.

3.0
Oct 30, 2019
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance Employee benefits are generally good Colleagues are fantastic Take health and safety very seriously (one of the company values) Invest heavily in charity/charitable events Own a lot of well known brands and products are high quality Some good product innovation in recent years despite stagnant market conditions

Cons

Local decisions contradict corporate strategy which puts departments at heads with one another Too much bureaucracy Too much control desired by Amsterdam without understanding local operations Current 15 by 20 strategy is short-sighted as we appear to be embarking on a penny-wise, pound foolish culture e.g. getting rid of experienced heads, bringing in less experienced (cheaper) heads and then allowing poor decisions (costly) to be made Bonus is non-existent for the past few years - local support function bonuses are tied to global performance which is totally stupid as sales and marketing counterparts are not HR may as well be a robotic chat bot as they are nigh on useless on most matters A lot of reactionary thinking and not enough pro-activeness - 15 by 20 is a perfect example of this as it only came about after the PPG bid.

Viewing 79 - 81 of 1,871 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,286 AkzoNobel reviews submitted anonymously by AkzoNobel employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if AkzoNobel is right for you.