Procter & Gamble reviews

4.1

81% would recommend to a friend

(14,345 total reviews)
avatar

Jon R. Moeller

83% approve of CEO

65% positive business outlook

Procter & Gamble has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 14,345 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Procter & Gamble employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufatura industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

14K reviews
1.0
Jan 7, 2017
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Great brands built by a legacy of talented employees from creation to the early 2000's. Since then, not much though...

Cons

Probably the next Kodak or Blockbuster among Dow Jones companies; due to bureaucratic old management driving change agents out of the company. Worst talent management among top global companies. Used to be regularly in top 5 of best company to work for rankings; but is now struggling to make it to the top 100. Employees are treated as the enemy by a poor HR organization. All efforts are done to discourage employees to stay; from comp&ben cuts to talent assessment and career advancement. Particularly true for expats. International career is a must after 5 to 10 yrs. However, P&G offers one of the most uncompetitive, complex and unfair expat package, constantly being cut. Expats are considered as a cost to reduce, not as an asset to nurture and all decisions and policies are making expat life more difficult. This result in strong struggle in developing markets where capability is a key challenge and where expats are most needed. More and more expat employees are found having 2nd jobs or income sources; which is unheard of from such a mega company.

3.0
May 1, 2016

R&D researcher

Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

great culture and superiors, awesome colleagues

Cons

Terrible career track for researchers. Scientists are highly favoured over researchers, as it takes only 3-5 years for scientists to advance to the senior scientist level, whereas it takes typically 10-15 years or more for outstanding researchers to rise 3 levels up to the same level. The difference is that scientists have Masters or PhD/experience, but researchers have bachelor's degree. Very very few in the researcher track will stay on in the long term.

2.0
Mar 3, 2016

Plant Technician

Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

if you are a skilled mechanic you can earn a decent living

Cons

micro-management like I have never experienced before, way too much unnecessary paperwork and they will change certain documentations at will as well as add more. they tell you that you must maintain 80-85% production rate, yet if you are hitting 90% plus it doesn't matter, they will harass you in meetings or out on the floor for not filling out some graph on a board that has nothing to do with your daily production or some other meaningless garbage. promised raises that never happened, yet always increasing your workload. I could go on and on, you get the picture.

Viewing 256 - 258 of 14,345 Reviews

Glassdoor has 21,332 Procter & Gamble reviews submitted anonymously by Procter & Gamble employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Procter & Gamble is right for you.