employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Big Fish Games

Is this your company?

Big Fish Games reviews

3.5

66% would recommend to a friend

(313 total reviews)
avatar

Larry Plotnick

75% approve of CEO

51% positive business outlook

Big Fish Games has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 313 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Big Fish Games employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Mídia e comunicação industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

313 reviews
1.0
Sep 2, 2020
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Big Fish games was a stable place to work with functional, happy teams and engaging projects.

Cons

This company was sold into new management and has since shifted its strategy from making games in house to generating quick and cheap content overseas. This is no longer a company that makes games, in spite of the name. Lay offs have become increasingly frequent.

2.0
Jun 21, 2019
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Great/hilarious coworkers, sometimes there's free food, the work itself isn't hard but it's tedious, public transit costs are covered 100%, associate managers and senior reps in CS are super supportive and work tirelessly to help us, sometime get to just chit-chat with great customers that play the games.

Cons

Absolutely no work/life balance unless you can afford to live in Seattle (lol), no competitive pay/stagnant wages, upper management only cares about making us a "billion dollar company," no job security since they're planning on outsourcing our department to India within the next year or so despite the fact that there's other options to "better reach our players faster", upper management will boast about how great your department is before gutting it. All they care about is making more money and "better aligning with Aristocrat (parent company)."

1.0
Apr 27, 2014
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

The people like having fun -- it's easy to make friends here. Interesting technical challenges.

Cons

Poor management in software engineering. They claim to be "agile" but there is nothing agile about the way they work -- it's really "waterfall" style sprinkled with scrum meetings. I worked on several projects. We spent hours upon hours planning and re-planning entire projects 6 months into the future. When the schedules inevitably slip, we cut corners and cancelled test automation work, requiring entire teams to run manual regression tests on nights and weekends while last-minute bug fixes trickled in. Promotions don't make sense, they're usually based on who makes more noise rather than actual contributions. Retrospective meetings were mostly a facade -- managers didn't welcome negative feedback. Suggestions for improving the development process were often discouraged and frowned upon. People got made fun of by managers for thinking unit tests were a good idea. Technical debt is rampant, even in services/tools that should be long-lived. Good user experience is not prioritized, resulting in bad products that fail in production. Individual contributors clearly not valuable as people to management, treated like interchangeable parts.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 313 Reviews

Glassdoor has 349 Big Fish Games reviews submitted anonymously by Big Fish Games employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Big Fish Games is right for you.