Future reviews

3.2

46% would recommend to a friend

(712 total reviews)

Kevin Li Ying

65% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

Future has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 712 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Future employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Mídia e comunicação industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

712 reviews
2.0
May 15, 2014
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Mostly, the employees care about what they're creating and the people with whom they're collaborating despite regular doom-and-gloom forecasts and constant belt-tightening. And most of people left there are highly creative, resourceful and good at their jobs. (They have to be, given the tight budgets and small staff sizes in each department.) Not that it adds all that much considering the negatives, the office location is nice, being right on the water along the San Francisco Bay. To many, that's offset by its relative seclusion--away from restaurants and shops, and away from San Francisco proper and with a limited shuttle schedule if you want to take the train.

Cons

Unfortunately, after numerous reductions in the job benefits, forced furloughs and a shrinking workspace over the past few years, if you stick around you become numb to how dire the situation truly is--especially when the UK parent keeps telling you that it's "turning the corner." And when headcount cuts happen (repeatedly), there's a potential for higher-ups to throw staff under the bus to save themselves, so you always feel like your job is sitting on the edge of a razor. In an Internet age, media business is evolving and companies/executives need to adapt, but Future can't seem to find its way to keep readership and find profit, so it loses (or kills off) great, established brands, and with that, loses lots of good, qualified people. I'm not sure the management--especially if there are new people regularly brought in to try to effect positive change--knows what it has to do to change with the landscape, so there's a lot of "let's try this...okay, now let's try this..." strategy shifting. It's sad, because the company successfully redefined itself a number of years ago (as it went from Imagine to Snowball, then to Future) and built its business back up, only to stumble badly as it seemingly missed seeing how the Internet was forcing it to radically change its business. Right now, I'm not sure it'll maintain relevance and find a good business model before its emperors discover they're not wearing any clothes...or more that the investors will discover the clothes they bought for the emperors aren't being worn.

1.0
Apr 10, 2014
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Future US still retains a small handful of people who are creative and maintain professional/editorial integrity. Salaries are in line with the rest of the tech media industry, though if that's a "pro," I'm stretching the definition. At the best of times, the Future US work environment was loose, casual and fun. This helped compensate for the overall feeling of dread and contempt employees felt about the company.

Cons

I worked at Future US for more than a decade, rose up the management chain, and quit when it became clear the UK-based leadership was incapable of making a successful transition from print magazines to online. The company seems to believe that digital magazines will be its salvation--which defies all conventional wisdom about the future of games, tech and enthusiast media. Digital magazine editions do nothing more than bandage print magazine wounds. They're an exit strategy. Not a growth strategy. The most fatal series of decisions involved the UK leadership pouring investment into internationalized online start-ups (Gamesradar, Techradar) instead of helping established US-based magazine brands (Official Xbox Magazine, PC Gamer, Maximum PC and Maclife) make the transition from print to web. The two "radar" properties have zero name recognition in the US market, and employ some of the most craven strategies you'll find online to monetize content. They blur the lines between advertising and editorial, and use obscene search-engine tricks to garner page clicks. The two radars may eek out revenue for the UK parent company, but they will never be major players with their current content plans. Meanwhile, the magazine brands have been gutted, and so the world watches to see these once-proud brands fade off into nothingness. Future would call this putting a brand into "maintenance mode": not investing, grabbing what revenue it can, and waiting for a war of attrition to come to an end. Other cons: Incompetent US management (though it appears they have all been sacked, and the UK runs everything now). Widespread employee contempt for the company. A building location in the middle of nowhere, accessible only by car and shuttle, and miles away from San Francisco's thriving games and tech media center. Finally, the company has zero name recognition. It means nothing on a resume.

3.0
Apr 2, 2014

Love the people, but they lack a big picture plan

Anonymous employee
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Great, talented people work here. They're passionate about what they do. Laid back office atmosphere. Open door policy.

Cons

Lack of any type of plan from upper management. It's like being on a ship without a captain. They're laying off people left and right without any consideration for anyone. The office morale is awful.

Viewing 676 - 678 of 712 Reviews

Glassdoor has 784 Future reviews submitted anonymously by Future employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Future is right for you.