employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

IHS Markit

Acquired by S&P Global

Is this your company?

IHS Markit reviews

3.7

74% would recommend to a friend

(3,786 total reviews)
avatar

Lance Uggla

93% approve of CEO

67% positive business outlook

IHS Markit has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 3,786 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The IHS Markit employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Gerenciamento e consultoria industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

4K reviews
2.0
Jan 25, 2016

Good company, horrible upper management

Anonymous employee
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

Good career opportunities for software developers, glass ceiling for subject matter experts in other areas. Great opportunities for clerks and third world employees off shore.

Cons

Bottom line is everything. Directors and VPs surround themselves with sycophants. Wearing rose colored glasses is mandatory at all meetings. Speak the truth or raise tough questions, and they kill the messenger. You will become a victim of your own success and longevity as up and coming "leaders" look to cut costs. Do not get old, that is grounds for dismissal. Do not make too high a salary, that is grounds for dismissal. Do not accrue too much vacation, that is grounds for dismissal. Forget about Sustainability or any other kind of company initiatives they try to Tom Sawyer you into, they are window dressing and have no bearing on your job or your performance and therefore are a waste of your personal time. They talk the talk, but do not walk the walk. Do not do anything extra that a Director or VP can claim credit for, they will. Most do not know what leadership is, they think its showing up at the 11th hour and making a speech, claiming credit and then making a few photo-ops to get their name in the paper. Annual "colleague engagement" survey is a joke. If the survey is to be believed year after year, most problems lie with upper management, and employee recommendations go unheeded. Misrepresentation is rife, scope creep and slipping schedule deadlines are the norm due to incompetent planning and execution with no accountability. Cutesy smiles and dimples seem to cover a host of incompetence. Quality is anathema among IHS upper management. They claim it slows things down in their rush to get stuff out to the client and cash their checks. They go out of their way to avoid being accountable for it. They punish anyone who raises questions about quality and disbanded the whole Global Quality organization because it became too much of a gadfly in their opinion, and might just tell the truth about how things were actually going.

2.0
Nov 11, 2018

On the decline

Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

There are some good people and good teams, though many of them are departing.

Cons

Compensation is definitely on a downward trajectory as the company grows. Benefits have declined annually for the past few years: health benefits are worse, the gym benefit is disappearing, and cell phones/subsidies have been taken from many employees. The bonus pool has also been disappointing for a few years, even in a good market.

2.0
Dec 17, 2014
Recommend
Business Outlook

Pros

IHS is a good place for a long-term middle management (manager) and below (analyst) career. If you're interested in keeping your head down, earning a decent but not outstanding salary, and collecting a paycheck, you've come to the right place. If you're ambitious, dream of continuous advancement and desire an opportunity to work in other countries or offices, then this isn't the company for you. And if you're female and have those same ambitions, definitely look elsewhere. Depending on your supervisor, there is usually a good amount of flexibility in hours as long as you are serving your clients; but you are expected to be on email 24/7 regardless of your pay scale. Negotiate at the beginning of your hire as pay raises are usually 2-3% annually at best. I had to fight hard to get 5% for a direct report who was outstanding one year in particular, capping off 7 years of excellent work. Benefits are pretty good and stock options can be rewarding, especially if you're on the "other" list - those compensated heavily in stock. If you're a particularly clever political animal, you'll do well here. With all of the acquisitions, it is a continuous minefield of change. and so your ability to navigate will be challenged, catnip for political players but misery for others.

Cons

Make no mistake, IHS is not a gender-neutral workplace. Just look at the leadership team - 2 of 11 are female and unlike many companies, that ratio permeates throughout, it doesn't increase as the funnel widens. There are a handful of female directors, but it's nearly impossible for a female to be promoted above that level so extremely difficult for an analyst to rise to a management position. There are very few female managing directors, and based on discussions with former employees, most were paid 20-30% less than male counterparts. Considering it's difficult enough to move up at IHS, adding in gender to the mix and most females can be assured of a long, slow, potentially very unproductive grind up the corporate ladder to middle management at best. IHS' style of growth by acquisition means there is a continuous stream of newly acquired talent coming into compete with you for your job, and there is no advantage to being an existing IHS employee. In fact, the newly acquired company sometimes will completely overwhelm the incumbent IHS division and the new employees will be running the division before you know it. In the last six years, in my experience, more existing IHS employees were laid off than newly acquired, excluding shared services (see below). The leadership team is often blinded by the shiny new objects rather than the tried and true. Management of divisions is often remote, so directors and VP's are often woefully out of touch with the sentiments of local offices, resulting in promotions of ill-equipped colleagues and redundancies of those actually doing the work. Decisions are made based on the opinion of a few people canny enough to have the ear of the remote manager. Managers see no issue with taking credit for new ideas or implementing new strategies without recognizing the original source. Speaking of redundancies, these are done in secret with no communication from managers. One day the person next to you is sitting at his or her desk, and the next day they're gone and there is no official information from management. This secrecy extends far up the management chain, and the entire leadership team is not briefed on the list of redundancies, even when that list includes very senior or high-profile individuals. Considering the company framework is about matrices and limiting silos, this is counterproductive, but telling. If your company is being acquired, and you work in accounting, HR, ops, or other "shared services," do start looking immediately. You'll have your job for about a year and then your tasks will be folded into the existing shared services division of IHS. I've seen it happen many times during my tenure.

Viewing 34 - 36 of 3,786 Reviews

Glassdoor has 4,111 IHS Markit reviews submitted anonymously by IHS Markit employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if IHS Markit is right for you.